"Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration in High-Bleeding-Risk Patients After Stent Implantation". The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021.
Links to original sources: Wiki Journal Post Full Journal Article
What is the appropriate duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients at high risk for bleeding after the implantation of a drug-eluting coronary stent?
One month of dual antiplatelet therapy was noninferior to the continuation of therapy for at least 2 additional months regarding the occurrence of net adverse clinical events and major adverse cardiac or cerebral events, and resulted in a lower incidence of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.
The MASTER DAPT trial evaluated the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients at high risk for bleeding after implantation of a biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent. The discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy at a median of 34 days post-PCI did not increase the incidence of net adverse clinical events or major adverse cardiac or cerebral events compared to a longer duration of therapy. However, it did reduce the risk of major bleeding events.
Current guidelines do not specifically address the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for the patient population included in the MASTER DAPT trial.
The MASTER DAPT trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority, and superiority trial involving 4579 patients.
Patients at high bleeding risk who had undergone implantation of a biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent, free from adverse events during the first month post-PCI.
- Abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (one month duration, n=2295) - Standard dual antiplatelet therapy (at least three additional months, n=2284)
- Net adverse clinical events at 335 days. - Major adverse cardiac or cerebral events at 335 days. - Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 335 days.
- The open-label design could introduce bias in reporting or management of outcomes. - The results may not generalize to patients with lower bleeding risk or those who receive different stent types. - Wide noninferiority margins could potentially miss a modest increase in incidence.
The trial was funded by Terumo.
The New England Journal of Medicine, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108749