About Index

RE-ALIGN

"Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves".The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013. 369(13):1206-1214.

Links to original sources: Wiki Journal Post Full Journal Article

Clinical Question


Is dabigatran an effective and safe alternative to warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves?

Bottom Line


In patients with mechanical heart valves, dabigatran was less effective than warfarin and was associated with a higher risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding complications.

Major Points


Mechanical heart valve recipients typically require lifelong anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, to prevent thromboembolic complications. Dabigatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, has shown efficacy as an anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation patients and was evaluated for patients with mechanical heart valves in the RE-ALIGN trial.

Guidelines


Current guidelines do not recommend dabigatran and other novel oral anticoagulants for patients with mechanical heart valves, generally favoring vitamin K antagonist therapy.

Design


Prospective, randomized, phase 2, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication, comparing dabigatran to warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves.

Population


Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years who had either recent (within 7 days) or past (at least 3 months prior) aortic or mitral mechanical valve replacement.

Interventions


Patients were randomized to receive dabigatran or warfarin in a 2:1 ratio. Dabigatran dose was selected based on renal function and adjusted for plasma levels, whereas warfarin dose was adjusted targeting an INR of 2 to 3 or 2.5 to 3.5.

Outcomes


The primary endpoint was the trough plasma level of dabigatran, with secondary endpoints including stroke, systemic embolism, valve thrombosis, and major bleeding events.

Criticisms


The trial was stopped early due to excess thromboembolic and bleeding events in the dabigatran group, which may have caused an underestimation of long-term efficacy and safety.

Funding


The trial was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Further Reading


Full details of the study design and results are available in the published article by The New England Journal of Medicine and additional supplementary material.