Back to Index

  • BEST Original
  • BEST



    ### Clinical Question
    In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, is PCI with everolimus-eluting stents noninferior to CABG in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events?

    ### Bottom Line
    In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, PCI with everolimus-eluting stents was not noninferior to CABG with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years. Over longer-term follow-up, CABG has a lower rate of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to PCI.

    ### Major Points


    ### Guidelines
    Current clinical guidelines recommend CABG as the preferred revascularization strategy for patients with complex coronary lesions and without excessive operative risk.

    ### Design
    - Multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial
    - N=880 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
    - PCI with everolimus-eluting stents (n=438) vs. CABG (n=442)
    - Setting: 27 centers in East Asia
    - Enrollment: 2008-2013
    - Median follow-up: 4.6 years
    - Primary outcome: composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization

    ### Population
    - Age ≥18 years
    - Angiographically confirmed multivessel coronary artery disease suitable for PCI or CABG
    - Excluded if had significant left main coronary artery disease

    ### Interventions
    - PCI with everolimus-eluting stents
    - CABG with preference for using the internal thoracic artery for revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary artery

    ### Outcomes
    #### Primary Outcomes
    - At 2 years: primary end point occurred in 11.0% of PCI group and 7.9% of CABG group (absolute risk difference, 3.1 percentage points; P=0.32 for noninferiority)
    - At median 4.6 years follow-up: primary end point occurred in 15.3% of PCI group and 10.6% of CABG group (hazard ratio, 1.47; P=0.04)

    #### Secondary Outcomes
    - Composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any repeat revascularization was higher after PCI than after CABG (19.9% vs. 13.3%; P=0.01)
    - No significant difference in composite safety end point of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke
    - Higher rates of any repeat revascularization and spontaneous myocardial infarction after PCI
    - Stent thrombosis occurred in 1.6% of patients within the PCI group

    ### Criticisms
    - Early termination of the trial might have reduced the statistical power.
    - Crossovers from CABG to PCI may have introduced a bias.
    - Results from the subgroup analyses should be considered exploratory due to restrictions in sample size.
    - Use of some medications varied significantly between groups.
    - Includes only patients of Asian race which could affect generalizability.

    ### Funding
    The trial was supported by the CardioVascular Research Foundation, Abbott Vascular, and a grant from Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health and Welfare Affairs, South Korea.

    ### Further Reading
    Additional details and investigators can be found in the Supplementary Appendix at NEJM.org.