Back to Index

  • PLATO Original
  • PLATO

    "Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes". The New England Journal of Medicine. 2009. 361:1045-1057. PubMed•Full text•PDF

    Contents


    1 Clinical Question
    2 Bottom Line
    3 Major Points
    4 Guidelines
    5 Design
    6 Population
    6.1 Inclusion Criteria
    6.2 Exclusion Criteria
    6.3 Baseline Characteristics
    7 Interventions
    8 Outcomes
    8.1 Primary Outcome
    8.2 Secondary Outcomes
    8.3 Subgroup Analysis
    9 Criticisms
    10 Funding
    11 Further Reading

    Clinical Question


    In patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome, does ticagrelor reduce the risk of cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel?

    Bottom Line


    In patients with an acute coronary syndrome, ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in reducing the risk of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke, without an increased risk of overall major bleeding but with an increase in non–procedure-related bleeding.

    Major Points




    Guidelines


    As of 2009, guidelines had not been published that reflect the results of this trial.

    Design


    Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial
    N=18,624
    Ticagrelor (n=9,333)
    Clopidogrel (n=9,291)
    Mean follow-up: 12 months

    Population


    Inclusion Criteria: Hospitalized patients within 24 hours of onset of acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation
    Exclusion Criteria: Contraindications to clopidogrel, fibrinolytic therapy within 24 hours before randomization, need for oral anticoagulation, increased risk of bradycardia, strong cytochrome P-450 3A inhibitor or inducer therapy
    Baseline Characteristics: Well balanced across both groups

    Interventions


    Ticagrelor – 180 mg loading dose, followed by 90 mg twice daily
    Clopidogrel – 300-600 mg loading dose if not previously received, followed by 75 mg daily

    Outcomes


    Primary Outcome: Death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months
    9.8% with ticagrelor vs. 11.7% with clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.92; P<0.001)

    Secondary Outcomes
    Death from any cause: 4.5% with ticagrelor vs. 5.9% with clopidogrel (P<0.001)
    No significant difference in the rates of major bleeding between groups

    Subgroup Analysis
    Benefit of ticagrelor appeared to be attenuated in patients under median weight, those not taking lipid-lowering drugs at randomization, and those enrolled in North America

    Criticisms


    Ticagrelor was associated with a higher rate of major bleeding not related to coronary-artery bypass grafting and more instances of fatal intracranial bleeding.

    Funding


    Supported by AstraZeneca.

    Further Reading


    Full text article available at NEJM.org